Published March 9, 2015
After a slow start for January, U.S. equity markets finished February on a strong note. U.S. indices showed the NASDAQ leading the way with a 7.1 percent gain for the month, the best since January 2012. The Dow was up 5.6 percent, and the S&P up 5.5 percent. Year to date, the Dow was up 1.74 percent, the S&P up 2.21 percent and the NASDAQ up 4.8 percent.

The drop in gas prices drove the U.S. into deflationary territory, as consumer prices declined 0.1 percent year over year. Prices fell 0.7 percent from December.

However, the U.S. is not expected to join Europe in a deflationary economy. Consumer prices in January, aside from energy, showed a healthy gain of 1.8 percent, in line with the Federal Reserve’s desired goal. Food costs were up 3.2 percent, shelter up 2.9 percent, and health care 2.3 percent. John Williams, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, said he believes that inflation will rise to the Fed’s desired level by the end of 2016. Janet Yellen, chairwoman of the Federal Reserve, indicated in testimony to Congress that weak inflation was due to the transitory effect of lower energy prices. Policy makers think the steep fall in energy prices will abate. We are already seeing price increases at the pump, with the cost of a gallon of gas increasing about 30 cents since the beginning of February.

Meanwhile, the easing of inflation has added to inflation adjusted wages, which have posted their largest gains since November 2008. Real average hourly earnings moved up 1.2 percent from December. A tightening labor market has also added to wage increases, with […]

Originally published February 9, 2015 in The Daily Journal of Commerce
U. S. equity markets rose 4.71 percent in the fourth quarter of 2014, as measured by the S&P 500. Strong earnings overcame a sharp mid-October correction. Coupled with disinflation fears in Europe, political turmoil, fear of a Greek exit from the European Union, and about a 40 percent drop in oil prices, economic uncertainty led to a slowing economy. GDP annual growth slowed in the fourth quarter to 2.6 percent – down from 4.5 percent in the previous quarter.

Consumers led the increase in GDP, with a 4.3 percent increase in spending – the largest since the first quarter of 2006. Lower gas prices and new hiring no doubt contributed to this increased consumption. The University of Michigan consumer sentiment increased to its highest level since 2004. The consumer sentiment increase was as high for those with incomes of less than $75,000 per year as those with more than $75,000 per year.

Other factors contributing to the decline in GDP were a build in inventories, which could signal a drag on future growth, and a huge drop in defense spending, although that may just be a timing factor. However, more troubling was continued ambivalence toward capital spending, which declining oil prices will not help, and a slowdown in foreign demand, which a stronger dollar will not help. All things considered, GDP growth may not exceed 3 percent in 2015.

The U.S. was the standout performer in equities for the year and the quarter, with most other parts of the world underperforming. Even so, for January the S&P was down 3.12 percent, the Dow down 3.7 percent, and the […]

Originally Published January 15th, 2015 in The Daily Journal of Commerce
U. S. equity markets rose over the course of 2014 as the U.S. economy continued to strengthen. In December the Dow was flat, the S&P was down 0.4 percent, and the NASDAQ was down 1.2 percent. For the year the Dow was up 8 percent and the S&P was up 11 percent – 13.7 percent when dividends were reinvested; the NASDAQ was up 13 percent.

The best sectors among S&P stocks were utilities (up 25 percent), health care (up 24 percent) and information technology (up 19 percent). Energy was the worst performing S&P sector. In late 2014, the S&P finally rose to a new inflation-adjusted high.

Stocks in 2014 as represented by the Russell 3000 were worth 143 percent of gross domestic product, the highest since year end 1999. Increase in household wealth is over $7 trillion over the past three years, according to the Federal Reserve.

Third quarter GDP was revised upward to 5 percent – stronger than expected. Consumer spending rose .06 percent from October to November with the effects of lower prices for gas at the pump taking hold. Oil and natural gas prices both dropped as moderate weather and slowing world economies created a supply glut in those commodities. Crude oil fell to $53.30, the lowest price since May 2009.

Personal income increased .04 percent over October. The strengthening dollar has made investments in the U.S. more attractive. The dollar might well be headed to parity with the euro, where it has not been since 2002.

The only dark spot in the U.S. numbers was that the consumer sentiment declined slightly to 93.6 percent from 93.8 percent […]

Originally Published December 8, 2014 in The Daily Journal of Commerce
The United States economy is strengthening.

November is historically one of the best months in the year for equities, and U.S. equity markets continued their upward trend in November. The broad market index, the S&P, gained 2.48 percent for the month while the Dow gained 2.52 percent.

Consumer prices held steady. The gross domestic product for the third quarter was revised upward from 3.5 percent to 3.9 percent. The GDP growth for the period from April to September was the strongest for a six-month period since 2003. This growth indicates that the U.S. economy is growing into the year-end shopping season. However, consumer confidence slipped from an estimate of 96.5 percent to 88.7 percent. Most of this seems to be because of downbeat job prospects.

Furthermore, the Chicago Purchasing Manager Index showed an unexpected decline of 8.1 percent while the Philadelphia Fed manufacturing index reached its highest level since 1993.

Oil prices continued their decline as oil traded as low as $66 per barrel. Oil prices are down in part because of more output in the United States from fracking, and because of reduced demand and the strong dollar. Oil prices are inversely related to dollar strength or weakness because oil contracts are typically priced in dollars. (There have been brief efforts to price in other currencies, to no avail). An OPEC meeting to manage the price decline did not produce an agreement because Saudi Arabia said it would not reduce production. Since there is an oversupply of oil in the world combined with softening demand, we can expect the price of oil to continue under pressure.

In the past, […]

Published November 6, 2014
In my previous column, I predicted that September and October would be volatile months. In October, the S&P 500 slid to a low of 1,820, temporarily erasing all of this year’s gains. The market volatility index soared 51 percent in just eight days. At its low, the S&P was down 9.1 percent from the beginning of the month. The S&P crossed below its 200-day moving average.

Fears of a slowdown in China, deflation in Europe, plus Ebola fed the market decline. Additionally, the Fed decided to end its quantitative easing program, but suggested that low interest rates might continue “for a considerable time.” Encouraged by a supportive Fed, the market began its ascent.

In its statement, the Fed took credit for “solid job gains” and a falling unemployment rate. It said that a range of labor market indicators suggest that labor market slack is “gradually diminishing.” In the process it struck from its statement an earlier assessment that “labor market slack was substantial” – a phrase investors have been watching closely for signs that the Fed was becoming more confident about the economy.

Of course, one of the reasons that the unemployment rate has fallen is that the participation rate (those looking for work) has fallen to multiyear lows. Furthermore, real median household income has fallen six years in a row and is at its lowest level since 1996. However, during this time transfer payments and other government programs, funded by massive fiscal stimulus in the form of U.S. government debt, has kept consumer confidence robust.

Twice before, Fed officials declared that the Fed would stop bond buying, only to restart the effort later when growth, […]

Originally published in the Daily Journal of Commerce, Portland OR
Published October 13, 2014
In my September column, I warned that September (and October) could be down months, with a correction of 5-7 percent possible. I thought that this pullback should be used as a buying opportunity. September and October are frequently volatile. The market lived up to expectations with September seeing wide market swings: Six days had over 100 point changes and one day had more than 200. The volatility index rose from 36 percent. The market in September saw the S&P drop by 1.4 percent.

October is often a scary month, and not just because of Halloween. Since 1929, the S&P has risen or fallen 6 percent or more on 91 occasions. Twenty-five of those changes have occurred in the month of October.

At the beginning of the financial crisis in 2008, the market had five moves of 6 percent or more, with moves up of 10.8 percent and 11.6 percent in a day, and down moves of 9 percent, 7.6 percent and 6.1 percent all in a day. In October 2008, in spite of the volatility, the market ended up 8.6 percent. History suggests that October could be a volatile month.

Many global concerns fed September’s pullback. China’s growth appeared to slow. The umbrella revolution unfolded in Hong Kong. Europe, with woes exacerbated by Ukraine, slid closer to recession and deflation. Ebola threatened to spread. Only the U.S. economy seemed to expand.

The expansion in the U.S. economy led American investors to fear that the Federal Reserve might raise interest rates sooner rather than later. This fear was a negative for the markets, but positive for the dollar. […]

Originally published in the Daily Journal of Commerce, Portland OR
Published Sept 8, 2014
Since April 2009, the last market bottom, U.S. equity markets have marched upward, increasing 172 percent through Aug. 31. For over five years, the market has been hitting new highs, on average every 14 days. But throughout this time, bears have called the end of the market rise; forecasts of doom have come regularly.

The bears have been on the wrong side of the market. This bull market has been hated and untrusted all the way. Yet once again it arrived at new highs. In August the market was up 3.8 percent. It is the first time this year that the market has been up all four weeks in one month.

So, is this the top? Will the market fall 30 percent, as some people have predicted? And what about the headline issues of Syria, ISIS and Ukraine?

The markets have continued their upward trend because of the healing process that has taken place since the credit market crash. The crash did not occur because of “irrational exuberance.” It occurred because of the work of financial miscreants who peddled mispriced financial paper to investors throughout the world.

The collapse occurred when “the music stopped playing” and there were no bigger suckers. It collapsed when the government refused to bail out Lehman Brothers, which was the linchpin, if not the culprit, in the whole scheme of things. With the collapse of Lehman Brothers came the collapse of the financial system and the credit markets (see my warnings about this during interviews on CNBC on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange in 2007 and 2008.)

After this collapse, […]

Originally published in the Daily Journal of Commerce, Portland OR
Published Aug 11, 2014

The second quarter of this year, U.S. equity markets returned 5.2 percent, as measured by the Standard and Poor’s 500 indexes, and outperformed most other developed markets.

This was the sixth straight quarter of positive returns posted by the S&P 500 through June 30, 2014. Because of growing turbulence in the Middle East, the prices of energy stocks were bid up. U.S. Growth and Value stocks posted identical returns at 4.9 percent. Commercial property real estate investment trusts posted stellar returns of 7.1 percent, the 17th consecutive quarter in the black.

However on the last day of July, the Dow Jones industrial average dropped 1.9 percent. After weeks of complacency, the volatility index spiked up, although not to alarming levels. For the past several years, these spikes in the volatility index have been followed by market rallies.

This past bull market has been a lesson in “don’t fight the Federal Reserve.” With central banks throughout the world working to support the economy, it would not be wise to bet against them. For the past several years those who have bet against the Fed and the equity market have lost.

That the equity market has taken a breather should be no surprise. The gloom-and-doom prognosticators have been predicting a market crash for years. A stopped clock is right twice a day. However, the markets marched steadily upward, much to the distress of the doomsayers.

Now they can say, “I told you so,” but it is not doom yet. Nor is it likely to be. For instance, David J. Kostin, strategist for Goldman Sachs Group, sees a strong divergence between […]

Originally published in the Daily Journal of Commerce, Portland OR
Published June 9, 2014
One of the oldest market timing indicators on Wall Street is “sell in May and go away.” This mantra is supposed to identify seasonality in the market. History shows that the weakest part of the year for stocks is the period from May to November. But critics think this theory confuses correlation and causation. This year should be especially bad, according to the pundits, because it is an election year – when there is more market uncertainty.

However, this was not the year to sell in May. This May, like the last several, was an up month for the market. Indeed, it was an up month for bonds as well. The Dow finished the month up 0.8 percent and the S&P was up 2.1 percent, its biggest monthly advance for the year. Both the Dow and the S&P notched their fourth straight month of gains. During the month, both indices traded at all-time highs.

The Dow is up 0.9 percent on the year, after a difficult January, and the S&P is up 4.1 percent on the year to date. Utilities, health care and energy led the way. Utilities alone are up 11.09 percent year to date, as investors sought yield. Transports are up 9.5 percent year to date. Transports are thought to be a leading indicator of market action, so their strong showing is a positive indicator for the market.

The Nasdaq rose 3.1 percent in May after two months of losses. The Nasdaq is up 1.6 percent year to date.

Safe haven government bonds also rallied in May, making it a clean sweep for the markets. […]

Originally published in the Daily Journal of Commerce, Portland OR

Published May 12, 2014

Off to a slow start for the year, the market climbed, but not steadily, to a new all-time closing high. The S&P reached its new high on April 2; the Dow followed suit on April 30. Along the way, results were decidedly mixed as the markets went through a rotation after the very strong 2013 gains.

Profit taking, rebalancing and sector rotation made the market lumpy. Companies that fared best in 2013 were sold by portfolio managers, and their prices were therefore affected negatively, even though fundamentals did not change. This does not make them bad companies, and we may yet see growth in those stocks. It remains to be seen whether all this reshuffling is good for portfolios, because now the portfolio managers have to find stocks that will do as well or better than the ones they sold.

According to the government, gross domestic product grew in the first quarter at a very low one-tenth of 1 percent, as a severe winter affected industrial output, exports and retail sales. While we had record snows, rainfall and flooding in parts of the Midwest and East, we had severe drought in parts of the West. This drought portends higher food costs.

Subsequently, JP Morgan and other economic forecasting firms said the GDP was actually in the minus column for the first quarter. Despite the soft conditions, the Federal Reserve stayed to its course of tapering quantitative easing. Interest rates were only marginally affected as investors moved from equities to bonds, because of the outstanding equity returns in 2013 and the flight to safety caused by events […]